That would be "
Determined Denial of Service," and I'm applying it to Indiana, whose governor signed a bill
legalizing discrimination against gay people on religious grounds.
Now I've never quite understood this desperate need of businesses to discriminate against
customers people who have different colors/genders/religions/ways of living. Theodore Sturgeon suggested that humans need to feel superior and therefore need to feel that others are inferior, but that really has nothing to do with the transactional relationship: I give you money, you take my money and part with the product or service, I take the product or service, and as long as there is no coercion or fraud involved, there should not be any problem. (Hmmm, that almost sounds...
libertarian.)
And yes, wedding planners and the like do have to work closely with the spouses-to-be, and may be made uncomfortable by organizing nuptials for people of the *gasp* same gender. They would also be made uncomfortable by "Bridezillas," folks who intend to have liquor at the reception, and people for whom "jumping the broom" is part of the ceremony. You'd think, what with the divorce rate, that these business people with religious scruples would refuse to deal with second-plus marriages unless the prior spouse was certified dead, but no. The wedding industrial complex mostly recognized that there was money to be made, and money over time has trumped religious objections to much (does
anyone refuse service to financiers or bankers on religious grounds? Usury is
specifically decried in the Bible. "Illegitimate" persons? Thieves? Murderers?
Politicians Liars? Those who disrespect their parents? No sweat).
The bill seems to cover all businesses, though.
According to Melissa McEwan at
Shakesville,
Although the Republican-controlled state legislature, nor the Republican governor, won't say it plainly, this reprehensible bill is their fuck-you to the federal government for thwarting their efforts to continue to ban same-sex marriage in Indiana. They want the right to make LGBTQIA Hoosiers second-class citizens, and they couldn't do it by banning same-sex marriage, so they'll do it this way. [Emphasis added.]
Souls the size of walnuts. Anyway. Repercussions have already begun.
Gen Con, a (
huge) gaming convention, is
talking about moving out after their contract expires in 2020, and has
the support of the host city. Salesforce is
cancelling business trips to Indiana. Other organizations, including the
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ)
have objected forcefully to the law.
Southern Beale as usual gets right to the point:
Let me also say, if your religion requires you to be a bigoted asshole, then I have no use for your religion. Can you just imagine? Whatever happened to “Love one another as I have loved you”? Of course, it’s not about the Bible. It’s about belonging to a club that needs to breed hatred and fear of “the other” to justify its lack of cultural impact. You people are supposed to go out and be salt and light in the world, that’s your Great Commission, and yet all you can do is fight for the right of a bakery to not make a gay couple’s wedding cake.
Blessedly, there is the
Open for Service campaign for non-bigot businesses (via Jean Ann Esselink at the
New Civil Rights Movement, via
skippy the bush kangaroo a comment at
Making Light [my mistake]). It would please me if service-to-all firms prospered and the discriminators went bankrupt, but that probably won't happen; the state of Indiana has economic problems that it's just made worse, and it will take a while to see that clearly. But the NFL is
watching the situation closely, and they moved the Super Bowl from Arizona in 1993 when that state's voters refused a Martin Luther King, Jr. holiday.
ETA:
Tim Cook decries the law.
The NCAA is "concerned."
Text of the Bill. In case.