Oh, Let's See...

• This is the 2,400th post.  Conspiracy theorists take note, and then take off.
• Via Comrade Misfit, from Madison.com:

  A self-described militia group claims to be checking names on the 2012 Scott Walker recall petition and plans to confront those found to have outstanding warrants or tax defaults at the polls on Nov. 4.

  (Warning: Madison.com wanted to leave tentacles on this machine. Do not allow them; I did not allow.)  As it happens, they are only targetting Democrats.  So Republicans with tax defaults and outstanding warrants are safe.  This is still voter intimidation, though, and I believe it is illegal, and, frankly, the police should arrest every single one of these bozos.
  
• Jon Carroll views with alarm (and R.I.P.s two of his cats).
• Six reasons to cut out meat from factory farms.  (AlterNet.)
• The Rude Pundit, as a general rule, is Not Safe For Work.  So read these at home:
• Kansas selling sex toys for back taxes (yes, a bit more complicated).
• Murder in a Walmart.  (Somebody told a lot of lies.) Republic of T wants justice and explains why people have less trust in the police and the justice system.
• History lessons in school.  How this country was made.  [ETA:  Somehow I missed Orcinus on this subject:

  The only reason that conservatives want to eliminate students from learning about episodes such as this is that they make clear that the white-bread narrative of valiant white pioneers forging a greater America is a farce. Learning about Sand Creek might make young white Coloradans uncomfortable, just as learning about the internment of Japanese Americans during World War II -- another subject likely to be dropped -- does.

  So glad Dave Neiwert is Back.]
• Culpability of Iraq war supporters for the IS situation (I will say, once again, that if the "We want a war right now" people want boots on the ground, it should be their boots.  Mr. McCain, that means you.  Mr. Cheney, likewise, and no, I don't care about your medical condition.  Any more than you care about the troops you put in harm's way.)
• Jesse Curtis asks "Why Can White Evangelists Only See Discrimination Against Ourselves?"

  Try actually talking about God's will being done here on earth as it is in heaven. Yeah, Jesus said it, but White evangelicals will tell you to calm down and realize that the world is going to hell in a handbasket anyway.

Yeah. Hermitting is the best plan.

There's Still Shouting

The Giants are one game from elimination, and naturally, they're playing the Dodgers.  Pittsburgh (!), for the first time since the glory days of Bonds and Bonilla, is about to make the playoffs.  The Angels have clinched, but since they have the most wins (97 wins is tops in both leagues), they will probably flake in the playoffs.  Meanwhile, Detroit and Kansas City are still duking it out in the AL Central.  Everyone else is looking down the wild card matchups, which may be Oakland v. Kansas City (yes, I get the irony there) on the AL side and Pittsburgh against whichever of the contenders wins tonight.

Rosh HaShona is tomorrow (well, tonight), and as soon as the regular season is over, fall can commence.

He Just Figured This Out

Eric Schmidt of Google has discovered that ALEC lies.  Ties have been cut.

ALEC's response:

“It is unfortunate to learn Google has ended its membership in the American Legislative Exchange Council as a result of public pressure from left-leaning individuals and organizations who intentionally confuse free market policy perspectives for climate change denial.

Freddie Mercury's Stunt Double

• Milwaukee has (division-race-wise) joined the choir invisible, and the possible wild card matchups are intriguing.
• Peter Van Buren (TomDispatch via AlterNet) explains the historical situation of Iraq and why the United States should have refused to have anything whatsoever to do with it.  Which reminded me that the late Steve Gilliard had written about military history and Iraq and extensively quoted gjohnsit of Daily Kos, who wrote:
  

  The first trick to learning from history is not to learn the wrong thing from history. For instance, Bush and the rest of the pro-war, right-wing liked to reference Neville Chamberlain before WWII as reasons to invade Iraq (and now, Iran). The Republicans are right to compare WWII and Iraq, but not for the reasons they think.
  If the Republicans weren't so ignorant about history they would have compared Yugoslavia to Iraq. No, not Yugoslavia in the 1990's. I'm talking about Yugoslavia during WWII.
  
  Like Iraq, Yugoslavia was artifically put together by the victorious allies after WWI, and combined several ethnic groups that had long, hostile relationships. They managed to live together for decades until Hitler decided that he didn't like their current government in April, 1941. Hitler invaded for no other reason than he wanted "regime change". Yugoslavia's army collapsed quickly. However, that was mearly the beginning.
  
  Hitler did not have enough troops available to contain any outbreak of ethnic strife, and Yugoslavia decended into civil war.
  

  In Croatia [in 1941] the indeginous fascist regime set about a policy of "racial purification" that went beyond even Nazi practices. Minority groups such as Jews and Gypsies were to be eliminated as were the Serbs: it was declared that one-third of the Serbian population would be deported, one-third converted to Roman Catholicism, and one third liquidated.
  - Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th Edition

  In the end, three times as many people died in Yugoslavia during WWII as died in the Yugoslavian civil war in the 1990's. The trigger was the overthrow of the government without the military force to enforce its will on an ethnically diverse people. Republicans learned the wrong lesson from history. Saddam Hussein wasn't Hitler. Saddam was King Peter II.
  
  Well, not really. But you get the idea.

• Together for 72 years, married this month.  Is your marriage threatened yet?
• See if this sounds familiar:

  We are better, we are more entitled, we are different or at least less interested in the people around us, or the tribes or nations around us, because we’re worthier than they are. Our people are the prettiest, our language is the most musical, our clothes are the most stylish. And these people are barbarians or at the very best civilized but crude. We are deserving of resources just as I, as the individual, am deserving of the raise, or deserving of the job or deserving of the hottest girl at the party because I’m better than the other guys around me.

  It's an article on narcissism, individual and tribal.  (Sarah Gray interviews Jeffrey Kluger for Salon, excerpted in AlterNet.)

In Memoriam

Polly Bergen, actress/singer/activist.

When I was small, she was a panelist on I've Got A Secret, and I could never figure out what she did.  I have to say that between the early '70s and now, I did not remember her at all.  I had no idea she was a feminist.

In Memoriam

• Jackie Cain, singer (Jackie and Roy; Roy died in 2002), who had a particularly fine version of "Lady Madonna" that I used to hear on the station I used to listen to back in the late '60s.
• George Hamilton IV, singer (I'd heard of him before I'd heard of the actor, and confused the two well into my teen years)

Johnny and The Moondogs

• Johnny:  San Diego, the Cubs, Cincinnati, Atlanta, Miami, the Mets, and Philadelphia have joined the previously eliminated National League teams.  Washington has won the division (which means they'll punk out in the playoffs).  Baltimore has won the equivalent division in the American League (yes, that means the Yankees were eliminated, and yes, I'm sad about Derek Jeter) over Toronto and Tampa Bay (Boston, Céspedes notwithstanding, having bitten the dust earlier).  Minnesota, the White Sox, and Seattle also go home early.  Meanwhile, the Wild Card stats are firming up.
• The Moondogs:  Miss America interned for Planned Parenthood.  (Salon, via AlterNet.)  The "conservative" press is shocked!  Shocked!  to discover she worked there for three! months!  The pearl-clutchers would  be even more horrified to learn that plenty of Miss Americas were pro-choice for women.  As it happens, I have a spare strand of pearls, but I will not be loaning it to conservatives; I might not get it back.

Social Studies

• Amanda Marcotte (yes, I know) at AlterNet spotlights seven women misogynists.  
• Samhita Mukhopodhyay (Feministing) wrote, for the Guardian, reprinted at AlterNet, another one of those articles about *gasp* how many people are single and how awful that is, although the middle of the article tries for a more nuanced view.  

  ...the stereotypes about single people are usually inaccurate and don’t take into account dating in today’s complex cultural and financial realities.
  
  Single simply means unmarried – not that anyone counted in singlehood’s ranks is not in a relationship. You could be in a seven-year relationship, going strong and still check the box for “unmarried” and decide never to participate in the institution of marriage, but only the government (and maybe your interfering mom) will think that you’re single. [...] Marriage has long been a mostly-financial transaction anyway: from when marriages were exclusively a deal brokered between a father and his son-in-law to be, to the ghastly cost of modern weddings, there’s always been money involved.

  And then the wrap-up:

  Many single people not in relationships have to navigate being caught between two worlds: one in which everyone gets married and it’s the standard organizing principle of our society; and one in which we can allegedly just “have it all” but can’t even pay our rent and are wondering if he’s ever going to text again.

  Only two? Really?
• Janee Woods (AlterNet) on the difference between discomfort and danger in racial settings.

In Memoriam

• 110 Stories, by John M. Ford.
• Terrance (Republic of T) reposts his essay from the fifth anniversary, eight years ago.

Their Lips Are Moving...

Straws.  Without which one's bricks are rather goopy...

• On the mawwiage (thank you, Impressive Clergyman) front:
  • Still trying. Still ridiculous.

    Allowing gays and lesbians to wed, Stewart said, creates "genderless marriage" and "weakens the social expectation of the child's bonding right," leading to a likely increase in fatherless and motherless children.
    
    Judge Ronald Gould asked Stewart where children's "bonding rights" could be found in the law. The attorney acknowledged he had no legal source, just the messages that states and social institutions send to men and women.
    
    If you really want to send a message, Berzon said, "put up a billboard."

    No, really.
  • This marriage is between a man and a woman.  But folks are...concerned.
  • ETA (Just went up at Republic of T):  Marriage as panacea.  Unless, of course, you're gay.  Or not having children.  Or not possessed of a college degree.  Or or or.
• Zandar calls it:  The Mask Slips Again.  Or alternately, Pennywise the Clown does not dress at home.

  Like I keep saying, Republicans want fewer people to be allowed to vote. This is a solid plank of their platform, to make sure a few people vote as possible. When that happens, they win. When people vote, they don't. Therefore, they must stop people from voting by any way possible.
  
  Especially if those people are black.
  
  This is why when I see people declare there's no difference between the two parties and that voting doesn't matter, I want to slap them. If voting doesn't matter, why are Republicans trying so hard to stop people from doing it?

  [Emphasis in original.]
  

Mathematical Elimination Fever!

Now that September has spent a week in residence, let's check on teams playing out the string or acting as spoilers, because otherwise there would be a lot of links and ranting, even now.

American League:  Boston, Houston, and Texas are out, with Minnesota poised to join them.  National League:  Arizona and Colorado are in Wait Till Next Year territory.  The Cubs will be there by the end of the week.

My team, of course, is mired in a slump.

Useful Term

Hey, they said it.

You Said a Mouthful

• Melissa McEwan on the Republican Party:
  

  Republicans' primary problem with women is, and will always be, this: They think that we're stupid. They think that there's some way they can trick us into not caring or not noticing that their policies are crap.

  This can also be corroborated at Margaret and Helen.
• Zandar Versus The Stupid spots Rand Paul airing his inner fool in Guatemala.

  Remember when the Dixie Chicks were blackballed for suggesting as Americans that George W. Bush's foreign policy on Iraq was wrong? Eleven years later, it's now 100% acceptable for a sitting US senator to go abroad and openly attack the President, with the head of state of a foreign nation in attendance.

  Gee. Ya think?
• Batocchio last week was on fire, and I'm only quoting one paragraph because otherwise I'd end up quoting the entire post, and the one before, and the one before.

  Pushing for gay rights, including marriage and protection from getting fired for one's sexual orientation, isn’t about seeking elevated status, but mere equality. This is a crucial distinction. Yes, the push for gay rights makes social conservatives upset, and yes, it entails a change from decades ago. It is not, however, an assault on their freedom, which has not changed, only a diminishing of their privilege, which they took for granted. Cultural norms have shifted and no longer support what they view(ed) as the natural order. The same thing happened with slavery and women's suffrage and Jim Crow laws – things changed, and frankly, progressed. To quote another old post that can apply to bigotry or cultural narcissism in general, "of course people of faith have a role in the public square, they just shouldn't have a privileged role. They can propose public policies, but they don't automatically get to have their way by citing their religion. They don't automatically get to win."

• Comrade Misfit points up an interesting statistic. Yes, I am thinking about the Michael Brown killing and the police riot in Ferguson. Yes, there is rage. Later.

The People Who Disagree With Edwin Starr

Actually, with the songwriters of "War."  But you know what I mean.

The Slacktivist reminds us of the reasons "some people have earned the right not to be listened to".  (Thank you, Mr. Fallows.)

P.S.  Invariably the people in favor of war will not have to fight it.  I think that disqualifies them right there.

In Memoriam

Richard Attenborough, actor and director.

Tango In The Night

1. I am fine.  Shaken but fine.  (I'm not in Napa County.)
2. As I look at the news from last week, I am reminded that humans (I include myself here) fail consistently in the "Love one another." requirement.  Which is really why we can't have nice things.

In Memoriam

• Don Pardo, announcer.
• B.K.S. Iyengar, teacher and practitioner of yoga

In Memoriam

Lauren Bacall, actress and legend.

In Memoriam

Robin Williams, actor and comic.

"Drop That Fountain Pen, You're Under Arrest."

Video on bank regulation or lack of same, at Naked Capitalism.  Some of which is comprehensible.

Born on this Date

That would be Stan Freberg.

(Mentioned back here.)

In Memoriam

• Steve Post, New York radio personality.
• Manny Roth, club owner. 

And This Cost How Much Again?

Two years of investigating Benghazi have yielded no administration wrongdoing.

Thompson said the report "confirms that no one was deliberately misled, no military assets were withheld and no stand-down order (to U.S. forces) was given."

That conflicts with accusations of administration wrongdoing voiced by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista (San Diego County), whose House Government Oversight and Reform Committee has held hearings on the Benghazi attack.

My, what a surprise. Not.

Via Driftglass, who noticed that:

While there were the usual flood of wingnut-driven Benghaaazi hair-on-fire "news" stories choking the internet over the weekend, so far as I could find, there was nothing related to this story (other than this SFGate article) when I searched for news about "House Intelligence Committee" or "Mike Thompson".

The story came out on Friday afternoon, incidentally. But still.

Whoops!

I missed my anniversary!

Six years!  Break out the Cold Duck!

And Hair Will Grow on your Palms

Why the arguments against same-sex marriage make no sense anymore.

What coherent justifications for anti-gay policies could possibly exist in a post-Lawrence landscape?

The answer, it turns out, is that there are none—none, at least, that aren’t driven by animus. A review of the failed attempts here is instructive. At various points, conservatives argued that every child deserves a mom and a dad; that gay people simply make inferior parents; that marriage isn’t marriage without penile-vaginal penetration; that legalizing gay marriage would lower birth rates; and, best of all, that somehow, allowing gay people to get married would cause more straight people to have children out of wedlock.

Are you snickering? So were the judges who had the pleasure of hearing these arguments spelled out in court.

Slate, via News From ME.

In Memoriam

• Margot Adler, journalist and writer (also the founder of WBAI's Hour of the Wolf, for which I used to get myself conscious at 5 AM and switch on the radio.  I met her a few times).
• James Shigeta, actor.
• Bel Kaufman, Up the Down Staircase.

Having Learned Nothing from Jaws...

A clip from The Strain, via Spocko's Brain (and no, that was not intentional).

The Ongoing

Power may be in inverse relation to empathy.

Not a surprise.  Feminist Philosophers, via I think one of the links at Wiscon38Fail (it hasn't gotten a proper Fail Name yet, and I do not want to use the "accused"'s name as the Fail Name).

Heads'-Up/Uh-Oh!

Ebola patient on the loose.  This is not a good time to visit West Africa.

Strange Juxtapositions

(Is the Dread Dormammu running HYDRA?  It would explain so much.)

• Vagabond Scholar on the ongoing adversarial relationship of civility and bullshit.

  For example, maybe you sincerely believes that someone calling Dick Cheney a "war criminal" is distasteful, because, uh… he hasn't been formally convicted as such. Or it sounds harsh. Okay, but you should be more outraged by what Cheney actually did, his role in constructing a a torture program and his dishonesty in selling a war of choice. Don't agree with all of that? Fine. But the defining feature of civility trolls, the smarm patrol, the bullshitters, is that they're trying to shut honest discussion down. They don't want to investigate. They don't want accountability (not for their team, anyway). For example, there's a reason torture apologists steadfastly ignore all the accounts and mountains of data proving their claims false. Pick another issue if you like; the same dynamics often play out.

• Paul Krugman discusses why conservatives are upset about California.  (AlterNet's Janet Allon, on Mr. Krugman's column.)
• Remember the psychological profiles of conservatives ten years ago that caused some hoo-hah?  More evidence.

  The authors go on to speculate that this ultimately reflects an evolutionary imperative. "One possibility," they write, "is that a strong negativity bias was extremely useful in the Pleistocene," when it would have been super-helpful in preventing you from getting killed.

  (From Mother Jones, via AlterNet.)