- Another Republican confused by same-sex marriage:
LOL. Yes, it’s always, always all about the free ride with Republicans, isn’t it? Hilarious.
I just have one question: say you’re a straight person wanting a “free ride” — maybe it’s getting on someone’s health insurance. Why would a straight person marry someone of the same sex to get that free ride? Why wouldn’t they just marry someone of the opposite sex? I mean, I’m sure that’s happened. We’ve all heard of green card marriages and whatnot. It’s not like straight people didn’t invent the marriage of convenience a thousand years ago.
So, that made no sense to me. Also, this:
Everhart said if she had a young child, she wouldn’t want them to have gay parents who would influence that child’s sexual orientation.
You know, there’s this amazing fun fact that Sue Everhart needs to consider: the vast majority of gay people had straight parents! I know, totally weird, huh? - The authoritarian imperative:
This is a recurring trait among authoritarians (looked at in most detail previously here) – they truly believe that they should be able to control other people's lives and make decisions that are none of their damn business.
[Warning for some ableist language.]
This attitude isn't limited to far-right social conservatives, however. Mitt Romney's campaign remarks about 47% of Americans being 'takers' focused more on economic/fiscal issues (also the idea of a social contract), but weren't that different. Like Fagan, Romney's accusations are grossly counterfactual, and like Fagan, there's a mean streak there – a sense of entitlement, and resentment, and a desire to punish his less-fortunate fellow Americans (certainly if one looked at his budget plan).
"My hovercraft is full of eels." Political (Monty) Pythonist and baseball fanatic. Other matters as inappropriate.
Monday, April 1, 2013
That's What We Had To Eat...Without a Spoon
Two samples of the same thing, really:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment